Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Rec center fee unnecessary for classes off campus

Students who will not be able to use the rec center for the summer should not be charged

Published: Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 00:04

When the Marshall Recreation Center debuted in spring 2009, everyone was excited. We jumped for joy that our university had added something so extensive and modern. It was such a change from Gullickson Hall, which didn't have nearly the room, cleanliness or variety of equipment as the new rec center has.


The Office of the Bursar put up a statement under MyMU saying that students had ranked the rec center as a top priority on campus and voted for a mandatory fee for its construction. The Marshall University Board of Governors took this request and set up a mandatory, non-refundable fee to charge all undergraduates, graduates and professional students taking courses on the Huntington campus.


At the surface, this information is all well and good. The recreation center is amazing and so the word ‘expensive' puts it lightly in the cost it took to build. As students use and enjoy the rec center, it is unquestionable that we should have the responsibility to help pay for its construction.


The catch is that students still have to pay a recreation center fee even when they are off campus. For example, people may be staying at home in the summer and taking online classes, but they still are charged a recreation fee for that time span. Another example is students who may not even be taking official summer classes but are enrolled in an internship, which is probably going to be off campus in most cases, yet a fee is still charged. One student is doing this and is being charged $42.75. The problem is, she's not going to be using the rec center during this time because she's going to be living at home 70 miles away and outside commuter range.


This is not right at all. We should not be charged a fee if we are not even going to be on campus to use the rec center. We already get charged enough during the fall and spring semesters when we are taking classes on campus and are even charged a fee after we have moved on and graduated. Plus, the Board of Governors announced just last week that the fee would be increased for all students by $24.50. That puts it at $193.50 per semester for all full-time undergraduate students


In the statement by the Office of the Bursar, it said the Board of Governors would charge students taking courses on campus. In short, online classes and internships are not physically taught by a professor on campus and students will not be commuting to campus to take the class, so the fee should not be required.
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments Log in to Comment

Anonymous
Fri Apr 30 2010 14:50
What about the students who take classes on campus, but do not use the rec center? They are still forced to pay for a service they do not wish to use. The fee should be removed completely from tuition. If a student wishes to use the rec center, they should pay for a membership for however long they want. Students should not be forced to pay if they have no use for the rec center.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 28 2010 11:59
Get the facts straight please. I am taking online classes and DO NOT get assessed the fee. I checked on this prior to signing up for classes. Incidentally, I do pay fees that support things like Athletics, the library, etc even though my classes are online and I'm nowhere near the Huntington campus. That would be a more relevant topic for debate in my opinion.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 28 2010 10:11
What about the students who take online classes over the summer who DO plan on using the rec center, or those doing internships who DO plan on using the rec center. Do you suggest that before people pay for summer classes they specify specifically whether or not they plan on using the rec center? What about all of those who pay during a regular spring or fall semester who never use it, should they be able to opt out if summer students can opt out?
Anonymous
Wed Apr 28 2010 10:00
The new Student recreation Center was long overdue and has provided a valuable outlet for the Marshall community. Although it's operation was outsourced and permanent charges were implemented just consider what the facilities were prior to its construction-very poor and much too small. It is a bargin and well worth th price. Enjoy it as Marshall finally joined what 90% of the universities across America have, a quality student recreation center.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In